The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has officially admitted that hundreds of children have developed some form of autism after being vaccinated.
In the United States, a major pediatrician practice with 30,000 children does not vaccinate its patients at all…
The number of children diagnosed with autism has increased exponentially in recent years.
I have believed (and maintained) for many years that, epidemiologically and scientifically, all forms of autism (including those such as Asperger’s) are nothing more than vaccine-induced damage.
What is the evidence ?
Well, there is a puzzling lack of research, but in the United States, one large pediatric practice with 30,000 children does not vaccinate their patients at all.
And they have had no children affected by this terrible disorder.
Once upon a time, such an observation (known as epidemiological research) would have been considered of great value.
Today, strangely enough, it is dismissed as irrelevant.
Only a fool (or someone more interested in money than truth) would deny the existence of a link.
Here are seven undeniable facts.
1.Autism (in its most severe forms) is a brain-damaging disorder.
2.Vaccines can cause brain damage.
If it is known that vaccines can cause brain damage, is it not logical to assume that they can also cause autism ?
I suspect that all children currently diagnosed as “autistic” are actually suffering from varying degrees of brain damage caused by vaccines – and should be compensated by big pharmaceutical companies, doctors and the government.
3.The incidence of this disease has increased exponentially as the number of vaccinations has increased.
There is an extraordinary correlation between these two phenomena.
Once rare (in the 1990s, no more than 4 or 5 children per 10,000 were affected), it is now officially claimed that autism affects more than 100 children per 10,000 (some claim the real number is much higher).
Data from around the world show that the incidence is increasing in all developed countries, in parallel with the increase in the number of vaccinations administered.
Of course, none of this proves that vaccines cause autism, but how anyone can simply deny the possibility of a link is beyond me.
The epidemiological evidence is overwhelming.
4.Children who report brain damage after vaccination are unresponsive and require a great deal of stimulation.
They respond well to flashing lights, colors and motion.
The same is true of children with severe autism.
5.Some so-called “experts” claim that autism is caused by environmental pollution.
Curiously, these “experts” do not believe that injecting foreign substances into young children is a form of pollution.
6.Some parents have reported that their children had a particularly negative reaction to childhood vaccinations.
Based on the evidence reported to me, I am convinced that if children scream a lot after vaccination, or are strangely quiet, or show other unusual signs, then in my opinion there is a real possibility that they may be developing a form of autism.
7.The US government stated that they have recognized that vaccines can cause autism.
I believe that the evidence (including epidemiological evidence) supports this hypothesis….
I personally believe that autism is caused by vaccinations.
I believe that the evidence (including epidemiological evidence) supports this hypothesis.
I suspect that some children have a hereditary predisposition and therefore may react negatively to vaccinations.
And if it is known that vaccines can cause brain damage, is it not logical to assume that they can also cause autism ?
Wouldn’t it be appropriate to at least do some high-level research to identify a possible link ?
Part of the problem is that there is no single definition of autism.
It is a very general definition that is used to refer to a wide range of symptoms, from severe brain damage to relatively mild behavioral problems.
Many doctors now agree that severe autism is due solely to brain damage caused by vaccines, while mild autism may simply be an excuse used when a child does not behave as parents expect.
Under these circumstances, the diagnosis provides a social excuse for school failure, for example.
Social workers lend themselves to this game because they can be well paid to “treat” autistic children.
Of course, it is much cheaper for governments to provide a modest amount of “care” for autistic patients than to admit that they have been harmed by vaccinations and then compensate them with large sums of money.
The pharmaceutical companies (and the doctors, hospitals, and politicians who support them) all claim that there is no link between autism and vaccinations.
They claim that there is no convincing scientific evidence of a link between the two.
On the other hand, there is no evidence to disprove the link between vaccinations and autism.
But in response to all those who continue to claim that there is no link, I remind you that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has officially admitted that hundreds of children have developed some form of autism after being vaccinated.
