Freedom to think or “group think” ?

January 19, 2025 Reflections of a heretic

Is it possible to get reliable and accurate information today ?

Veronica Baker


Freedom to think or “group think” ?

Freedom to think or "group think" ?
Freedom to think or “group think” ?

The Great Awakening (i.e., uncritical and free thinking, in short, so-called “freedom of thought”) is not only a secondary channel for the public away from the mind control of the “corrupt” mainstream.

More importantly, it is meant to help withstand the difficulties we will face in the near future through the transparency and regeneration of individual thinking, breaking the chains of so-called “group think“.

Indeed, when free and “non-dogmatic” information becomes free and transparent, it poses a real threat to those who seek to control the natural course of events and manipulate reality.

By relearning to think freely.

“Truth” should be found on the basis of logic, reason and empiricism.
Not through coercion, manipulation of reality, or the creation of dogma.

Only falsehood

Mainstream information is exclusively false and biased.
Facts are never reported exactly as they happen.

However, an ideological slant is always given.
By now, people’s minds are almost completely lobotomized and cannot distinguish blatantly false or ambiguous messages.
The only purpose is to confuse them by diverting their attention from the content.

This is a very specific disinformation technique.
What I have called in the past a “reality manipulation technique“.

A refined version of the famous “Goebbels propaganda”.
But much, much more devious.

Freedom to think or "group think" ?
Freedom to think or “group think” ? True Wizards of MassDisinformation…

It is a crude mechanism.
But effective.
A constant pounding of the same information.

In addition, some concepts are obsessively and repeatedly stressed, while others are not.

Techniques well known in any state where a dictatorship is in power.

At this point a question arises.

Is it possible today to get reliable and accurate information?
Or is it the flood of information from many sources that makes it impossible, if not very difficult, to come to correct conclusions about a subject?

For example, in order to get correct and scientific information on many subjects, it is necessary to know English well.
Otherwise, you are very likely to get incorrect or outdated information.

The same applies to the study of certain subjects that require special preparation.

In addition to the problem of basic culture, in order to get to the truth about certain subjects-even if you have the right information-you then have to know how to select it, how to distinguish the good from the false, misleading, useless, partial, or unreliable.

Unfortunately, this is the big problem today.

So there is a chance to get much more correct information.
Or dismantle disinformation campaigns.